On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:34:37PM +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard"
>
> * Package name : usbguard
> Version : 0.7.1+ds-1
> Changes since last upload:
>
> * New upstream version 0.7.1 (Closes: #868160)
The bug you're closing is not "please package new upstream". Thus,
this part should be:
* New upstream version 0.7.1
+ Fix failure with read-only /etc (Closes: #868160)
> * remove dh-systemd due to being part of debhelper (>= 9.20160709)
> * bump standards version
> * add correct section to libusbguard0
> * remove parsing of dpkg-genchangelog
> * updated the watch file for the new github url, modified the archive name
> so the correct version will be used and removed the signature line, as
> that version is not signed
> * remove patches that have been upstreamed
> * add asciidoctor to build depends
Please run lintian before requesting sponsoring; it automates checking for
most of likely problems, saving time for both you and me:
E: usbguard changes: unreleased-changes
The package is explicitely marked as "not for uploading" (ie, is meant for
testing, review and further work). As you filed the RFS, I guess it's not
what you wanted...
W: usbguard source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token
debian/usbguard.postinst
Debhelper wants to add further things to the postinst, but doesn't know
where.
W: usbguard source: debian-watch-could-verify-download
debian/upstream/signing-key.asc
The new version is not signed; you should then delete (or rename away) this
key to mark the lack of signature as intentional.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...
