Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 19:14:18 +0100
with message-id <d3dbda19-b512-6841-6a4a-0efcb833e...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-12 [QA] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #885795,
regarding RFS: zapping/0.10~cvs6-12 [QA] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
885795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package "zapping". I would
appreciate if someone with a TV card (potential sponsor or not) builds
the package and eventually confirms that I haven't introduced any
regressions. It's obvious that it has some subtle bugs but I wouldn't
want this release to hit the archive if it introduces new ones,
regardless of their severity. I feel very uneasy to work on something I
can't really test, especially when I'm not familiar at all with the code
and the APIs. Thanks in advance.
* Package name : zapping
Version : 0.10~cvs6-12
Upstream Author : Iñaki García Etxebarria <gare...@users.sourceforge.net>
Michael H. Schimek <mschi...@users.sourceforge.net>
and other
* URL : http://zapping.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Section : gnome
It builds this binary package:
zapping - television viewer for the GNOME environment
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/zapping
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zapping/zapping_0.10~cvs6-12.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* QA upload.
* debian/compat: Bump to 11.
* debian/control (Priority): Set to optional.
(Build-Depends): Remove libesd0-dev (Closes: #856096). Require
debhelper >= 11. Remove dh-autoreconf and automake. Add
autoconf-archive for the AX_COMPILER_FLAGS macro. Remove ancient
version requirements for libgnomeui-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libzvbi-dev.
Add freebsd-glue [hurd-any] in an attempt to fix FTBFS on GNU/Hurd.
(Vcs-Git, Vcs-Browser): Use secure/canonical URIs.
(zapping-dbg): Remove in favor of automatic -dbgsym.
(Standards-Version): Claim compliance with 4.1.3 as of this release.
* debian/rules: Simplify -- remove unused variables, use standard
targets, order overrides sequentially. Remove trailing whitespace.
Enable all hardening flags. Don't invoke dh_autoreconf. Don't
install the .xpm icon.
(override_dh_strip): Pass --dbgsym-migration.
* debian/gnome-television.xpm:
* debian/menu: Delete as per Policy requirement.
* debian/zapping.install:
* debian/preinst: Delete, no longer necessary.
* debian/README.Debian: Fix two typos.
* debian/patches/03-Desktop.patch: Add Keywords field.
* debian/patches/08-Spelling-typos.patch: Fix yet another typo.
* debian/patches/15-Misc-warnings.patch: Fix more warnings.
* debian/patches/19-zapping_setup_fb_crash.patch: New; fix a segfault
when zapping_setup_fb is invoked with an invalid display name. Thanks
Alexandre Rebert / Mayhem Team for the report (Closes: #716640).
* debian/patches/20-Check-return-value.patch: New; fix compiler warnings
[-Wunused-result] which popped up due to the hardened CPPFLAGS.
* debian/patches/21-GnomeVFS-to-GIO.patch: New; port to GIO, hopefully
done right (Closes: #868412).
* debian/patches/22-gnome-common-deprecate.patch: New; don't use
deprecated gnome-common macro (Closes: #829824).
* debian/patches/series: Update.
* debian/changelog: Whitespace cleanup.
* debian/copyright: Rewrite to adhere to copryight-format 1.0.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package "zapping". I would
> appreciate if someone with a TV card (potential sponsor or not) builds
> the package and eventually confirms that I haven't introduced any
> regressions. It's obvious that it has some subtle bugs but I wouldn't
> want this release to hit the archive if it introduces new ones,
> regardless of their severity. I feel very uneasy to work on something I
> can't really test, especially when I'm not familiar at all with the code
> and the APIs. Thanks in advance.
>
I'll trust your work, I reviewed and seems ok. I can't find an adapter to
double check the code, but
we can followup in case of bugs (sorry, but I still prefer this rather than
having an RC buggy package in the
archive)
thanks for your work!
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
