Since the upstream maintainer would somewhat like to see py2 bindings in repo. But if python team is actually removing all py2 things, this is discussable.
And I can't reproduce it. Could you attach a full log? 2017-11-05 10:50 GMT+08:00 Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl>: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:33:24PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: >> * Package name : jieba >> Version : 0.39-1 >> >> It builds those binary packages: >> >> python-jieba - Jieba Chinese text segmenter (Python 2) >> python-jieba-doc - Jieba Chinese text segmenter (common documentation) >> python3-jieba - Jieba Chinese text segmenter (Python 3) > > Also fails to build, with a lot of: > UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u8fd9' in > position 0: ordinal not in range(128) > > This kind of problem is typical for Python 2 -- but, why would you introduce > a new package with python2 bindings when we're actively trying to get rid of > it? > > > 喵! > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. > ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.
