On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:31, "Adam Borowski" <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:49:22PM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > I just saw that building on freebsd-i386 failed due to memory exhaustion > > during compilation of tests. The only workaround that I can see is to > > prevent tests to be compiled if the memory is not enough to compile them. > > Do you see any better alternative? > > Do you think it's a matter of just available memory, or of address space? > > It did build on all other architectures, including 32-bit ones, so the > former is more likely, but you know the package better.
As far as I know it is just a matter of available memory. In the past we estimated how much memory is needed to compile the package and limited the number of compilation processes according to available memory, with a minimum of 1 process. > kfreebsd-i386 is not a release architecture, though, so it's not vital to > fix it immediately. You really don't want reverse-dependencies to get > misbuilt, but I've just checked -- opengrm-ngram FTBFSes on kfreebsd-i386 > with the old openfst so this should be safe. Ok, I will add explict version dependency to other packages. Giulio
