Thanks Adam for the feedback. unstable is therefore appropriate.
I have switched liblightdm-gobject-1-dev and liblightdm-gobject-dev around in the latest upload. Hopefully this will resolve the first alternate rule on buildds cheers David On 24 May 2017 at 15:02, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:59:28AM +0100, foss.freedom wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter" >> >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> * Initial release. (Closes: #862934) > > Alas, it fails to build when build-dependencies are restricted to the first > alternative listed, such as sbuild's default -- which is also used on > official buildds. > > There's no package named liblightdm-gobject-1-dev anywhere in Debian -- you > need to put liblightdm-gobject-dev first. > >> Please let me know if experimental is perhaps more appropriate than >> unstable given the status of Stretch. > > For new packages, unstable is fine. In fact, assuming you believe the > package to be in a releasable shape, unstable is better as this way we won't > have to migrate the package. > > > Meow! > -- > Don't be racist. White, amber or black, all beers should be judged based > solely on their merits. Heck, even if occasionally a cider applies for a > beer's job, why not? > On the other hand, corpo lager is not a race.
