Hi, On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 22:30:39 +0200 Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> wrote:
> On 03/26/2017 09:19 PM, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean… should the ethercodes.dat > > file be removed / used from a different package? > > Yes. See also: > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-data-from-ieee-data-oui-db.html > > ieee-data also contains a script that allows the admin to > update the listing manually, and other packages can hook into > that update process if that's required. thanks for clarifying. I need to convert the oui.txt database to a different format (the script to do that is already available). Two options come to my mind: 1. use the maintainer scripts (postinst?) to generate the initial version of the converted database, add a hook for ieee-data to keep it updated 2. check if the database is up to date when the arpwatch service is started by the init system, update it otherwise Option 1 seems somewhat cleaner, but if I understand the mechanisms correctly, this will only trigger when the admin (or a cron job) calls `update-ieee-data`, and not if the ieee-data package gets updated. Since that would allow the converted database to become outdated, that leaves me with option 2. Is that acceptable or is there a better way to do it? The easiest way for me to check if the converted database is up-to-date is to depend on the existence of /var/lib/ieee-data/.lastupdate . Is that ok? > Repacking the source seems excessive to me though, since the > database is under a DFSG-compatible license (ieee-data is in > main), but the binary package should probably just depend on > ieee-data. (Or recommend it, if it can live with the file not > being available.) Ok, thanks. Regards Lukas
pgp7GCBgdj4at.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
