Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:27:33 +0100
with message-id <20170215012733.gq27...@sym.noone.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #851606,
regarding RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
851606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851606
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rmlint"
* Package name : rmlint
Version : 2.4.6-1
Upstream Author : Christopher Pahl <sa...@online.de>
* URL : https://rmlint.readthedocs.io/
* License : GPL-3
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
rmlint - Extremely fast tool to remove filesystem lint
rmlint-gui - GTK+ frontend to rmlint
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rmlint
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rmlint/rmlint_2.4.6-1.dsc
More information about rmlint can be obtained from
https://rmlint.readthedocs.io/.
Initial upload:
rmlint (2.4.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Initial upload to Debian. Thanks to Axel Beckert for getting
it all started. (Closes: #845155)
-- Carlos Maddela <e7ap...@gmail.com> Tue, 17 Jan 2017 04:45:28 +1100
Regards,
Carlos Maddela
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Carlos,
Carlos Maddela wrote:
> > Is there a reason not to use the official source tarballs from
> > https://github.com/sahib/rmlint/releases? (AFAIK and according to a
> > short check, GitHub no more produces different tarballs upon
> > subsequent downloads as it did in the past.)
[…]
> There wasn't any specific reason, except for trying to keep file sizes
> as small as possible. I have reverted to using the original tarballs now.
While trying to keep the package size small is appreciated, Debian
values original upstream tar balls more -- at least currently.
So thanks for that change.
> > In debian/rules I found this:
> >
> > # Automatically disable tests in sbuild and pbuilder.
> > ifneq (,$(filter /%nonexistent,$(HOME)))
> > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS += nocheck
> > endif
[…]
> I only disabled the tests to speed up builds.
And you already found out about "nocheck". Great!
> There was initially some problems with the tests inside of sbuild,
> which prevented successful builds, but they have been resolved. The
> test suite doesn't make use of any $HOME directory. It was just my
> way of detecting if the build was being done from a chroot.
I see.
> Anyway, I have removed those lines completely, and the tests are
> performed now.
Thanks. The package got really nice. Seems to have been still quite
some work on top of my work
I've just uploaded your package and it should show up within the next
few hours in the so called NEW queue for review by the FTP masters,
i.e. at the end of https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Nevertheless I've got two suggestions for the next upload:
* Rename debian/docs to debian/rmlint.docs for consistency with the
other debian/rmlint.* files.
* Maybe rmlint-gui should ship a wrapper script called shredder which
just calles 'exec rmlint --gui "$@"' -- in addition to ship the
files necessary to make "rmlint --gui" work. But that's something
where Christopher might want to have a word about, too. :-)
Anyway, thanks for your contribution to Debian! (And thanks to Roger
for his review, too!)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
