On Sunday, December 11, 2016 1:20:05 PM MST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:16:21AM -0700, Herminio Hernandez Jr wrote: > > Let me try to clarify. Did my package use the code from upstream or the > > code from the watch file to build. > > Please read how gbp works. > gbp uses the version from d/changelog to find the upstream tag which it > then uses to recreate the orig tarball.
I have been reading the documentation here:http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM.GIT.NOTARBALL[1] Just what I saw threw me off I am probably reading too much into it. -------- [1] http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/ gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM.GIT.NOTARBALL
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
