Hi, > Reuploaded.
still not perfect, lets see the debdiff @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +mailfilter (0.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New upstream version + * Removed 01_remove_workaround_fixed_FTBFS.patch. Upstream reworked + Makefile respectively. + * Removed 05-occurred-spellfix.patch. Applied from upstream. + * debian/control + - Corrected upstream homepage url. + + -- Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:55:18 +0200 + mailfilter (0.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Make the build reproducible. Thanks to Reiner Herrmann for the patch @@ -6,6 +17,7 @@ -- Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:20:28 +0200 + mailfilter (0.8.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version. Fixes a FTBFS (Closes: 812668) added a space in the previous changelog entry diff -Nru mailfilter-0.8.4/debian/patches/series mailfilter-0.8.6/debian/patches/series --- mailfilter-0.8.4/debian/patches/series 2016-03-28 14:01:06.000000000 +0200 +++ mailfilter-0.8.6/debian/patches/series 2016-10-23 17:01:01.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -01_remove_workaround_fixed_FTBFS.patch 02_fix_build_newer_g++.patch 03_fix_invalid_conversion.patch 04_mailfilterex.5-spellfix.patch -05-occurred-spellfix.patch actually you didn't rm them, just from series file :) (not a real issue) >> I'm also worried about such licenses: >> ./src/rcparser.cc: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the >> License, or > >This file is availabe after build but instructed from >./src/rcparser.hh > >> ./src/rcparser.hh: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the >> License, or >> ./src/rfc822parser.cc: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of >> the License, or >> ./src/rfc822parser.hh: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of >> the License, or > >Those 3(4) files are cloned from bison. So they have all the bison >license. Neither Andreas nor me can change that. But it should be >confirm to the DFSG... why can't you just use bison then? https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies is something that should be kept in mind and BTW, I don't care about you changing the license (this is unfeasible), but rather documenting and adding it to debian/copyright. every copyright in the source tarball has to be listed there, regardless of it being used or not. G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
