Hi, On 02.08.2016 08:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I fully agree here, just a few questions about *where* to put this package. > http://www.vim.org/scripts/ >
I think I don't understand. > what about adding it as a patch to the current vim-scripts package? > https://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vim-scripts.html > > you might want to join the team and ask to comaintain it here maybe > Yes, this also came to my mind and I asked about it on their mailing list. James McCoy answered: "Individual packages are fine. Given the current state of vim-scripts, that's probably better. I've been delaying updating vim-scripts because of various problems in vim-addon-manager that I know will be encountered if those scripts are updated. I need to get vim-addon-manager fixed first." [1] So, I am not sure. Maybe it is an option to add it to vim-scripts once James has reworked vim-addon-manager and vim-scripts. Cheers, David [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825665#26
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
