On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:59:19PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Well, i don't have a strong opinion myself but rather wonder how it was > decided to put the lines into override.sid.main.gz .
All packages have an override line there. That's an implementation detail of the archive software. at the first acceptance time the ftp guy get to chose whether to leave what the maintainer picked up, or to change it. > Are there reverse dependencies which require priority "optional" ? dunno, but I can tell you that really ftpmasters don't care about optional vs extra. As most other people don't… > Shall i change the priorities in debian/control ? If you'd like to… It's possibly nice to have the same value, not personally sure what it would buy though. > (Is it a bug or a feature that the new package tracker does not warn ? > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libburn > ) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756750 -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
