On 21-05-2016 12:21, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >>>> But I don't think I need to write a documentation how to setup >>>> the config file is easy to understand, just feeding back it's needed to >>>> setup to get working. >>>> what do you think? >>> I meant mostly what's needed to get the basics running. >> My problem I didn't noticed problem about setup needed because I've >> installed at a machine was already working. > Right, that's understandable. > > If you're going to make complex changes to the packaging, it'd be a good > idea to test it in virtual machines, both fresh and as upgrades. However, > if you believe you can make it work without, there's no need to do so -- > I'll test it for you as I already have an array of VMs, some simple, some > bridged/etc. And especially, some with systemd some with modular inits, > as this package has .service divergent from its init script. > >>> I got the impression you're -trying- to have it work out of the box, in >>> which case no action is needed. If I'm wrong and configuration is >>> required,k >>> then you need to 1. handle lack of such config gracefully, and 2. point the >>> user as to what needs to be done. >> I've done the most changed you pointed, either the feedback about that >> setup is needed to get it running. >> my question is just about user perspective, if I really need to write a >> documentation how to configure or >> just show to user they need to setup. Something like "Edit >> /etc/lsm/lsm.conf is needed to get it running." > Just that line included in the fail message would be enough, I think. > > I've got a little busy, but I uploaded a reviewed package, if you can take a look at it I'll thanks.
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsm/lsm_1.0.4-1.dsc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
