Hi! Now after month, any news regarding this package? On Wednesday 27 April 2016 12:53:06 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Pali and mentors, > > (redirecting the question to -mentors, because I don't have a strong opinion > on this) > > > >Looks like we do not have exact license text as those file "were > >generated" by brute-force methods by more people and put into public > >domain. People names (or nick names) are already included in copyright > >file. That is all what I know and cannot do more. If there are or there > >are not law problems it is probably question for other people... > > there should be a verbatim copy of the license included in the upstream > tarball > > look e.g. to > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html > License II and III sections > > > so, either you have to document how the license is obtained, or how to > reproduce the files > generation. > > I know licenses are a waste of time for somebody (they were for me when I > started > my contributions in Debian :p )... > but they are the best way to get your package rejected by ftpmasters! > > So, this point is really a showstopper for the inclusion in Debian of the tool > (BTW if you want to ask ftpmasters about their opinion let me know their > answer). > > I would like to avoid uploading and get a reject, but I would consider an > upload with a ping to ftpmasters about this issue. > > cheers, > > Gianfranco > > > Il Martedì 26 Aprile 2016 23:07, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On Thursday 21 April 2016 10:16:29 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016 08:36:49 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > >There is no more info about it just as it is public domain, no > > > >more license texts... What to write into paragraph then?? > > > > > > everything is a license, and public domain is a license too. > > > https://codesearch.debian.net/results/License:%20public-domain/page > > > _0 > > > > > > G. > > > > Looks like we do not have exact license text as those file "were > > generated" by brute-force methods by more people and put into public > > domain. People names (or nick names) are already included in > > copyright file. That is all what I know and cannot do more. If there > > are or there are not law problems it is probably question for other > > people... > > Gianfranco, what else needs to be done? I think I done everything what I > was able to do... > >
-- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
