Le 16/05/2016 12:40, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Eric, some questions on the changes: > 1) why do you need both autotools-dev and autoreconf? Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here. About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it. I installed it to test it. Since all seems ok, I've not removed it.
> > 2) did you get an ack from maintainers to add yourself as uploader Yes. In addition, I've just asked them to post their ask on this list now. > > > 3) +Replaces: gnustep-common (<< 2.6.8-1) > > this is something I don't understand. If you upgrade gnustep make bin package with old gnustep-common installed, we need to replace the gnustep-config.1 manpage. > > also, the control.in file removal is not documented I guess Yes, this is a consequence of the debian/rules rewriting. > > maybe Aron (ccd), being the latest sponsor might give you an additional > review and sponsor the package Thanks for the tip. > > thanks for the really nice work! Thanks, I worked hard last week with upstream. > I did a test build and the build logs looks good to be, as well as the built > binaries (however I didn't install them). I tested it with latest upstream version of gnustep-base, gnustep-gui and and gnustep-back, and all seems okay. I tried it with several GNUstep related debian packages and all seems to works fine. I also tried to rebuild several debian gnustep packages with it and I did not find any FTBFS. Eric
