Hi, >Isn't I'm supposed to raise the version number? or is "+nmu1" enough?
I'm not sure, but in fact dch --nmu is not raising it, so I guess 1.8.2+nmu1 is fine, so the maintainer can still bump and release an NMU acknowledge called 1.8.3 >It part of the fix, but not needed to fix #818540 (as I understand). not a problem >No file attached here? You talking about this file correct? >https://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.2ubuntu1.patch yes >I did as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818540#39 >suggested, do you disagree with that solution? Is the original solution >preferred? it is fine, I just want to know your opinion. >Just pushed to mentors. seems still not working completely... this is what I get on a clean pbuilder environment ERROR: failed to retrieve status information from google : W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by key 4CCA1EAF950CEE4AB83976DCA040830F7FAC5991 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1) W: http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg: Signature by key 3B068FB4789ABE4AEFA3BB491397BC53640DB551 uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1) the ubuntu version prints the warning but starts the download anyway. what do you think about? G. ---------------------------------------- > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:41:25 +0000 > From: locutusofb...@debian.org > To: klausenb...@hotmail.com; ba...@debian.org; 824...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#824186: RFS: pepperflashplugin-nonfree/1.8.3+nmu1 [RC] [NMU] > > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > Hi, some questions about versioning and changelog: > > 1) why 1.8.3+nmu1 and not 1.8.2+nmu1? > 2) why UNRELEASED? please set unstable > > "* Validate deb file with sha256sum." <-- isn't this part of the fix for bug > #818540? > > the other stuff LGTM, I hope to sponsor it soon :) > > BTW did you see the ubuntu diff? > you might want to take some bits > > (attaching the debdiff between debian and ubuntu, I'm not talking about > fields like changelog entries > and maintainer field, more about the update script) > > thanks! > > G. > > > Il Venerdì 13 Maggio 2016 15:39, Kristian Klausen <klausenb...@hotmail.com> > ha scritto: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pepperflashplugin-nonfree": > > * Package name : pepperflashplugin-nonfree > Version : 1.8.3+nmu1 > Upstream Author : Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> > * URL : http://wiki.debian.org/PepperFlashPlayer > * License : GPL3 > Section : Browser plugin > > It builds those binary packages: > > pepperflashplugin-nonfree > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/pepperflashplugin-nonfree > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.3+nmu1.dsc > > > Changes since the last upload: > > pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.3+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Update Google public key. Closes: #823005. > * Remove 32 bit support. Closes: #816848. > * Don't treat `apt-get update` warnings as errors. Closes: #818540. > * Validate deb file with sha256sum. > > -- Kristian Klausen <klausenb...@hotmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 14:44:52 +0200 > > > Regards, > Kristian Klausen
