On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 05:52:29PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > On 09/04/16 18:31, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > > the only reason is that it doesn't build on most architectures. The > > > upstream devel version build, I think, on other archs, but it hasn't > > > been released yet. I've asked the upstream author to release a new > > > version, but unfortunately without any success. > > > > So, what I can do is to release libsdsl to only limited number of > > > archs (amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x) and then in the future I would > > > extend this list. This will obviously limit the architectures that > > > any reverse dependency will build on. > > I've just done it.
] Architecture: amd64 arm64 ppc64el s390x But why would you artificially restrict this to just these? 2.0.3-1 successfully built also on: alpha kfreebsd-amd64 mips64el ppc64 sparc64 x32 Of these, only alpha can be considered a doorstop architecture. -- A tit a day keeps the vet away.
