Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi. > > Frank Küster wrote: >> dh_shlibdeps nicely sorts out the libraries that a binary package >> depends on. Quite nicely, since I get "xlibmesa3 | libgl1", but there >> seems to be no package named libgl1. And how do I figure out the correct >> Build-dependencies:-line? Are there any tools? > This is created by the shlib file of the package that provides the > xlibmesa3-Library. libgl1 is to be a virtual package for packages implementing > opengl (or whatever it's officially called). (Take a look at "apt-cache showpkg > libgl1".)
Ah, thank you. > Building your packages with pbuilder (and testing those) will catch most of your > obmissions. I'll try that - last time I tried, some weeks ago, it seemed unstable was un-installable. > BTW: (Learned by my own obmission.) For free packages, you might also want to > check whether the build-dependencies are in main. (IIRC, molmol is non-free, > anyway, though.) Yes, it's non-free. I will have to ask the authors wether it may be distributed at all. >> Of course if I use some utilities not in build-essential, I have to know >> that myself and put them there. But what about libraries? Can I just >> assume that for every library in the Dependencies of my binary package, >> I need the respective libfoo-dev in Build-Dependencies? > More or less, yes. What would be a case of "less"? TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
