I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl files are arch-independent and thus belong to /usr/share, OTOH /usr/share is supposed to contain _data_ files, while libraries and modules should go to /usr/lib.
Looking at other scripting languages in Debian, I see that Python, Ruby and Tcl modules go exclusively to /usr/lib, while Perl modules can be found both in /usr/lib and /usr/share. Am I missing something in FHS or is it really lacking precision about modules and libraries for interpreted languages? Was this problem discussed before? -- Dmitry Borodaenko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
