On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote: > I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts, > and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best > to name these packages like "$package-$cpu"
Look at how the atlas2 package does this. ld.so has a rather nice feature that allows processor optimised versions of libraries to be installed in parallel with generic ones and automatically located at runtime. If you use this your CPU optimised versions can be installed at the same time as the generic version (which is what everything depends on). > Another question - is this enough? Do I need to change any of > dpkg-architecture variables, or are they here only for defining the base > architecture (i386 even for pentiumII or k6 processors)? You don't need to change any of the dpkg-architecture options. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
