On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 13:11, Michael Furr wrote: > err, guess a link to the packages would help: > > deb http://userpages.umbc.edu/~fu1/debian unstable main > deb-src http://userpages.umbc.edu/~fu1/debian unstable main
I took a quick look at your packages; the first thing I noticed is that your diff is a bit big: walters@space-ghost> diffstat ../vegastrike_0.2.9.2-4.diff.gz /tmp/vegastrike/vegastrike-0.2.9 [...] mission/.deps/button.Po | 117 ++++++ mission/.deps/easydom.Po | 159 ++++++++ mission/.deps/file.Po | 204 +++++++++++ mission/.deps/general.Po | 131 +++++++ mission/.deps/glut_support.Po | 115 ++++++ mission/.deps/graphics.Po | 208 +++++++++++ mission/.deps/hashtable.Po | 123 ++++++ mission/.deps/select.Po | 208 +++++++++++ mission/.deps/selector.Po | 208 +++++++++++ mission/.deps/text_area.Po | 208 +++++++++++ mission/.deps/xml_support.Po | 141 +++++++ Is it really necessary to create these files? I bet they're just cruft that 'make clean' didn't remove. mission/Makefile | 358 +++++++++++++++++++ Since the Makefile is generated from Makefile.in by configure, you shouldn't patch it in your diff. [...] objconv/Makefile | 226 ++++++++++++ saveinterface/Makefile | 26 + [...] vssetup/src/Makefile | 29 + Not sure about these. Other than that, your package looks good. I'd prefer it if you had your key signed by a Debian developer before I sponsor you. Could you try to do that first? At least the key: pub 1024D/B056CC96 2002-04-12 Michael E. Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that I got from pgp.mit.edu was not signed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
