Le Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:05:23AM -0500, Brooks R. Robinson a écrit : > Greetings, > I am playing with packaging a new version of mico since it's been orphaned. > The README.debian file references the original packaged version and a blurb > about mico that may be inaccurate. It seems that this file hasn't been > updated since it's original packaging. Is it customary to leave this kind > of file alone or is there carte blanche to change it. Also, in the > changelog, since I am not an official developer (yet), is it appropriate to > list in the changelog myself as a new maintainer or some blurb about it's > orphaning and my packaging?
Hi Brooks, Christophe Prud'homme is working on this package too I think. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200202/msg02099.html I just sent him yesterday a patch correcting soname pbs ; BTW, this may still be erroneous. You can find the patch at : http://yam.sortilege.org/debian/patch-libmico-debian-20022905.gz below are my comments on the patch : ---- The libraries are now named libmico.so.VERSION. I removed libmico.so when installing the files to force the linker to reference the good file at linking time. Additionnally, I added the soname "libmico.so.2.3.7" to the library (-Wl,-h,libmico.so.VERSION passed to g++) I do want the linker reference specifically this version since 2 versions are not compatible at runtime. This is not specific to mico. ---- ++ -- * Eric GENTILINI ******************************** * 4th year student in Software Engineering * * Ecole des Mines de Nantes - http://www.emn.fr * ************************************************* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
