>
> For shared libraries, I would use libijs{n} and libijs-dev, but ijs
> does not yet have a stable ABI, and is not versioned properly as well
> as being tiny, so I have just packaged it as a static library.
>
> Would 'ijs-dev' be legal (as in publib-dev), or should I use
> 'libijs-dev' (or is this for shared libs only?).
>
think long term, will it become a shared lib? If so using ijs-dev now makes it
easier to ask for that package to die and libijs and libijs-dev to takes its
place later.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
