>>>>> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote: >> What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed. > I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous. > HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply as ssed for now, then > run very comprehensive regression tests to make sure it has no incompatibi- > lities with GNU sed. Maybe, symlink sed to ssed in your system to help with > this testing. Super sed comes with a fairly comprehensive test suite which passes without problems. However, I still agree that it is too early to divert sed now. > If ssed is indeed faster, better, and backwards-compatible, as well as > maintained upstream, we might want to use it as our sed for woody+1 > (provided you email enough evidence that it would be a good idea, and the > sed maintainer agrees with the exchange). Another advantage is that this version of sed is internationalized. However, I agree that this is definitely a woody+1 issue. Ganesan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
