Martin Sj|gren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[filing for removal of old gap packages]
> That is probably a good course of action, but I think it would be a
> bad<tm> idea to do it before the new gap4 packages have hit unstable,
> which they haven't done yet.
>
> So, should I wait, or "re-orphan" it in the meantime?
I don't think re-orphaning makes much sense. It could only induce
other people to make the same mistake. I say, post a short summary of
the issues to the bug, and keep it in ITA.
--
Robbe
signature.ng
