[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >because it forces everything to look like it's owned by root. Use > > >sudo. > > > > That's not true: > > You're right, as long as you haven't exited fakeroot and started it up > again in the meantime; I didn't realize that. It should be noted that this requirement is broken when your rules have something like: install: install-stamp install-stamp: build-stamp install stuff chown someuser stuff binary-arch: install-stamp build package because than it is possible to build the package in two fakeroot runs, i.e.: fakeroot debian/rules install fakeroot debian/rules binary and the changed owner will be lost. That's another reason it's better to chown in a binary target... -- Robbe
- How do I control ownership of installed package files? Steve McWilliams
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... Colin Watson
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... harpo
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed pac... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... Colin Watson
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... harpo
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... Nicolas SABOURET
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed pac... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed pac... Josip Rodin
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed... Josip Rodin
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package... Hamish Moffatt