Hello,
thanks for this short/efficient anwser.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>this
>> may change in the future if my proposition to debian policy are
>>accepted. Do you think this is possible?
>>
>
> What proposition?
>
To replicate a Debian system we need to know which configuration files
are replicable and which ones are not. The word replicable must be
defined. One the definition is written in the policy we need to maintain
a list of the non-replicable file so that the replicating system
(whatever it is) know what files is not allowed to copy (and what files
it needs to regenerate).
> Replicator doesn't look important enough to be put into potato. You can
> release potato compatible debs on your sourceforge site, but I think there's
> no chance of getting this added to potato at this time. You should focus
> on woody.
Ok I'll find 2 tests machine.
> Eric
SEb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
