Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The RSA patent was only valid in the USA, an oversight on RSA's part. > That's the difference. But surely a sizable chunk the Debian usersbase lives in the US, there were official CDs sold in the US containing the software, etc. So the difference is only gradual: more potentail users, and more mirrors (if mere distribution is really illegal) would be affected. -- Robbe
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Andrew Suffield
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Michael Beattie
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Viral
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Robert Woodcock
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Eric Van Buggenhaut
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Christian T. Steigies
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Andrew Suffield
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Paul Martin
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Adam McKenna
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Eric Van Buggenhaut
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Manoj Srivastava
- Re: [users] Re: Where's lame Sven LUTHER