> The reason one might need to recompile might be that > glibc2.1 had a bug which was fixed in 2.2. You don't want the package > to be rebuilt on every other architecture, just because of that. In that case, wouldn't you want to add an architecture-specific build-depends on glibc2.2, so I don't accidentally build a buggy package from source? -itai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Richard Atterer
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Christian T. Steigies
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Christian T. Steigies
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Christian T. Steigies
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Itai Zukerman
- Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU? Tollef Fog Heen
- Itai Zukerman