On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote: > > For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and > > use chroot jails for *all* builds. It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant, if it would not necessary, wouldn't it? > I support the chroot jail concept, but in this case gimp1.1 would > need to build-depend on lpr to get a proper build. Isn't it possible to change gimp so that it will always support them? Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- NMU and ./configure Itai Zukerman
- Re: NMU and ./configure Colin Watson
- Re: NMU and ./configure Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: NMU and ./configure Michael Beattie
- Re: NMU and ./configure Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: NMU and ./configure Michael Beattie
- Re: NMU and ./configure Itai Zukerman
- Re: NMU and ./configure Bernhard R. Link
- Re: NMU and ./configure Christian T. Steigies
- Re: NMU and ./configure Colin Watson
- Re: NMU and ./configure Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: NMU and ./configure Colin Watson
- Re: NMU and ./configure Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: NMU and ./configure -> library upgrades... Stefan Alfredsson
- Re: NMU and ./configure -> library upgr... Josip Rodin