I'd check this myself, but I haven't got a sufficiently easily greppable archive to hand ... I'm maintaining the project I'm currently hacking on as a native Debian package, which also happens to use autoconf and automake. automake likes to make symlinks to some scripts in /usr/share/automake that it uses (such as install-sh, missing, and mkinstalldirs here), which are then dereferenced by a 'make dist'. Since I'm maintaining it as a native Debian package, I never actually do a 'make dist', so unless I dereference them manually the symlinks end up in the .tar.gz. However, manually copying the files around means that they don't automatically get updated when I install a new version of automake - but I like going the native package route, as I get several useful things for free. How do other people who use automake in native packages handle this? Should I just leave the symlinks in there and build-depend on automake? -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]