> If I simply would package libpll-2 in the very place where libpll was > packaged and I keep *that* name (without the -2) this would be pretty > convenient since its not a new Debian package and does not need any new > processing. Do you think this is the correct way to go?
Yes, I think this is the way to go. In fact, in the next major raxml-ng release, both `libpll-2` and `pll-modules` will be superseded by the new lib `coraxlib`: https://codeberg.org/Exelixis-Lab/coraxlib This should hopefully solve the long-lasting historical name confusion. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/164#issuecomment-1684443628 You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Message ID: <amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/164/1684443...@github.com>
