Hi Andreas, it will be best to remove it, I suggest. I do not have any personal contact to upstream, somehwat unfortunate since this looks very nice and educational, but ... unless someone enjoys such a transition, I suggest to just wait for a version 0.10. Best, Steffen
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Februar 2024 um 14:02 Uhr > Von: "Andreas Tille" <andr...@an3as.eu> > An: "Debian Med Project List" <debian-med@lists.debian.org> > Cc: "Steffen Möller" <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> > Betreff: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm > > Hi again, > > if there is no response of kind "Yes, please try to keep the Python > interface of ghmm" it will be removed soon. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:34AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Hi Steffen (and two whom it might concern), > > > > when Israel has written the autopkgtest for ghmm it turned > > out that there are several issues with the Python3 interface. > > In Matrix Nilesh raised the perfectly valid question: > > > > The py interface is living off a patch from py2to3 and is (very) > > broken. It needs quite a lot of patching. Maybe it's a sensible thing to > > evaluate if we even need it? > > > > Could you please state your opinion about this? > > > > We should respond in a timely manner to the atlas removal > > effort (patch in Git) and currently it is blocked by the > > test suite issue of the Python3 interface. > > > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
