Hi Jochen,
Am Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 09:48:45AM +0200 schrieb Jochen Sprickerhof:
> > I confirm routine-update is going beyond the recommendation but in those
> > teams where I'm working (in CC) we have this de-facto standard to use
> > this file. Before I change the behaviour of routine-update I would like
> > to discuss this inside these teams and ask for opinions.
>
> I don't think we have a de-facto standard on that file in debian-science, at
> least I removed it from my packages a long time ago already and I agree with
> Christopher that routine-update should do the same. There is no benefit in
> having a file with the same content in every repo and every Debian package
> if we can avoid it.
Thanks for your opinion about this. What I mean with de facto standard: We
have about 2000 repositories configured to check debian/salsa-ci.yml. I have
not yet found a way to set the according field via gitlab API to something
else. If this is scriptable I'd happily remove debian/salsa-ci.yml. For the
moment I state two votes against salsa-ci.yml. ;-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
