Hi Aaron,
Am Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:06:23PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
>
> Per GCC's hint, please try formally substituting unique_ptr for
> auto_ptr. I haven't tested that approach for this package, but it's
> typically a safe drop-in replacement, and generally yields compilation
> errors in the rare cases where its usage would be problematic.
Thanks a lot for your hint. In
b37ea9fe211292d63bbc5174c6f85a71eb442390
I simply replaced std::auto_ptr by std:unique_ptr. Since this
ended up in a compile error at some auto_ptr (without std::)
instances I replaced in commit
adfab8681fe2abc495178691a95b5bd53bde4a67
auto_ptr by unique_ptr. This also failed and thus my last
attempt
24384abbcc03a54c793bd34e241617e809078223
was to replace unique_ptr by std:unique_ptr which fails as well[1]. I
will stop here with my wild-guessing now and hope for further helpful
hints.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/anfo/-/jobs/3313737
--
http://fam-tille.de
