Hi Aaron,
Am Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:13:37PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
> > If you think the package structure is OK I might upload to new.
> > Any other fine tuning that might be needed could be done in some
> > source-only upload.
>
> Good point, but I did already find two other things that would be best
> to fix before any upload:
>
> - dpkg-source errors concerning formal line-ending mismatches for Visual
> Studio files under vdb3/jwt-tool/googletest; I'm inclined to drop that
> subtree altogether, formally calling for 3.0.0+dfsg2 to avoid the need
> for force-pushes.
Ahhh, good catch. I admit I did not stumbled upon any dpkg-source errors
but I absolutely agree that we should drop VS files from upstream source.
> - Even with that subtree out of the picture, debian/copyright is out of
> date on various fronts, to which the FTP Team may well object.
Ups, thanks a lot for the review.
> > I absolutely agree ... but I have no idea about a test. We might
> > re-use the build time test partly. Or can you get some hints from
> > upstream?
>
> Reusing the build-time test could work, and might call for an additional
> binary package, which I suppose is another reason to hold off on
> uploading.
ACK.
> Also, as you noted in another thread, we are still fairly early in the
> release cycle.
So I simply wait. I'm perfectly fine if you would do the upload to
new if you are ready with what you plan to do.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
