Dear Lennart,
Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:44:32AM +0100 schrieb L.C. Karssen:
> Thanks for contacting me. I agree, let's remove ProbABEL from Debian,
> completely. The package is no longer actively maintained and I have
> neither had any support requests, nor public bug reports in the last
> year, maybe two.
Thanks a lot for your opinion. For the moment I decided to exclude all
architectures with failing tests and ask ftpmaster to remove the other
architectures. In addition I've added a warning to README.Debian about
the current status and that this package might be removed in the next
Debian release. Hope that can be considered a sensible compromise.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> On 19-02-2022 18:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > probabel fails its test suite for some architectures[1]. I reported
> > this upstream and got the response[2]
> >
> > @lckarssen Shall we ask if they remove Probabel from the Debian project as
> > a package? Since there is no workforce to maintain the software, it is
> > better not to use it. ( so also distribution and installing is not a good
> > idea)
> >
> > Popcon is low[3] - but that's not unusual for our packages.
> >
> > I see two options:
> >
> > 1. Remove probabel for the failing architectures only
> > 2. Remove probabel completely from Debian
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=probabel
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/GenABEL-Project/ProbABEL/issues/47#issuecomment-939993369
> > [3]
> > https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=probabel&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
> >
>
> --
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
> L.C. Karssen
> 's-Hertogenbosch
> The Netherlands
>
> lenn...@karssen.org
> http://blog.karssen.org
> GPG key ID: A88F554A
> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
