Hi Maarten, On 2022-02-02 12:44, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > Op 31-01-2022 om 14:49 schreef Andrius Merkys: >> This is purely informational. It says you probably should not attempt >> transitioning libcifpp and libpdb-redo at the same time. > > Hmmm, that didn't work, had to update both to make this work.
Right. It seems that you have uploaded libpdb-redo with the new SONAME to unstable. Normally this should also be done as a transition on its own, but since libpdb-redo has only one reverse-dependency I guess this is OK. > OK, the transition for both has started, see [1]. But I wonder, what > does the status 'partial' mean? Is there something I should do? > > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcifpp.html I have never seen 'partial' status before. Maybe someone else could comment on that. And density-fitness surely needs at least rebuilding, Nilesh is right. Best, Andrius
