Am 24.05.21 um 00:36 schrieb tony mancill: > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:36:43PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> On 5/23/21 10:00 PM, tony mancill wrote: >>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 06:16:42PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/catfishq >>>> is ready for review+sponsoring. >>>> Many thanks! >>> Hello Steffen, hi Debian Med@ >>> >>> Since I have worked on the fastqc package in the past and am trying to >>> increase my knowledge about FASTQ in general, I am planning to review >>> catfishq and sponsor an upload. >>> >>> I am posting to try to avoid duplicated efforts and because many on the >>> team are much faster than I am at reviewing and uploading... :) >> The github (not pypi) repository for this contains test data, please >> consider adding that >> and running autopkgtests on it, before uploading. >> The data size is barely 8K, so it can directly to d/tests dir > Hi Nilesh, > > I didn't see this until after I uploaded but I like the idea. We appear > to be on the same wavelength! :) > > I used the file from github, but since the test data is tiny (21 bytes) > and not a binary file, I didn't bother with a repack. It is included in > debian/tests/ [1] and the source documented in debian/copyright [2]. > > > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/catfishq/-/commit/b74ea1c6a2cd5e7785de92389a354b5e01de6f33 > [2] > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/catfishq/-/commit/fc82fefbad239d5e86c0374896a3af72d2e90e2f
I have seen the upload - thank you both! Should there be a bug report about the missing test data in the pypi tarball? Best, Steffen
