Hi Andrei,
is the task to rename the *.a file to lib*.a clear? Do you have
any problem with this. (If its just spare time issue at your side
that's fine. I'm just checking whether you need more help.)
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:10:50AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:51:50PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> writes:
> >
> > > I: ampl-netlib-solvers: unstripped-static-library
> > > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/amplsolver.a(asldate.o)
> > [...]
> > > I have not seen this info before but considering the size of
> > > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/amplsolver.a I suspect all needed libraries
> > > are statically linked which is what we do not want.
> >
> > Not necessarily; the library may in fact simply be unstripped. In
> > particular, it looks like dh_strip covers static (*.a) libraries only
> > when their names start with the usual "lib" prefix. If you specifically
> > need an unprefixed name, I suppose it would work to install the library
> > as libamplsolver.a so that dh_strip will see it, and direct dh_link to
> > establish an unprefixed symlink. If you're using Debhelper level 13 or
> > higher, you can do so without touching debian/rules by simply listing
> >
> > usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libamplsolver.a
> > usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/amplsolver.a
> >
> > in debian/ampl-netlib-solvers.links.
>
> I admit that would have been my next suggestion to name the file lib*.a.
> I did not expexted that this might solve the issue that the library
> might be unstripped right now. Thanks a lot for the hint.
>
> > Making a shared version of this library might be a good idea regardless.
>
> Definitely. It will be the next step.
>
> Thanks a lot for your hints
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
