On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:17:08PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > On 16.06.20 18:40, mer...@debian.org wrote: > > Hi Steffen, > > > > On 2020-06-16 19:37, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > Please kindly review and - either tell me to upload it or .. just upload. > > debian/copyright seems to contain dh-make templates: > > > > Upstream-Contact: <preferred name and address to reach the upstream project> > > Source: <url://example.com> > > > > Otherwise looks good. > Thank you, Andrius. Have revised it.
ftpmaster will most probably stumble upon python/OPENBLAS_LICENSE I admit I can not find any trace of blas code inside the source tarball - but there is this file and this will end in a reject. May be repackaging makes sense to spare this discussion - or I'm misleaded and there is actual blas code in and it should be mentioned. There is also src/kseq.h which is MIT licensed. Its somehow code copy 17 of this header file and I wonder whether we should normalise this over all our packages. Not sure whether this is the right moment but it should be mentioned in d/copyright. Also src/sse_mathfun.h has a copyright that should be mentioned. BTW, for MPL-2.0 you do not need to include the full text - its in /usr/share/common-licenses/MPL-2.0 and you can refer to this. Hope this helps Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de