Hi Étienne, On 2020-05-27 21:43, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Following your recommendation in the other thread, I opened a > branch swig-dedup, to assess if such task would be feasible. > The branch already has a commit with a swig call, a few options > maybe deemed minimum, and proper build dependencies. I may have > a look back at this stub probably not this evening, but in the > future maybe.
Thanks for opening the branch. I confirm that rebuilding the bindings with swig is not trivial in this case. You were right that there must have been manual additions to the swig-generated code. Let's leave it like this for now. Best wishes, Andrius
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
