Hi Aaron,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Hmmmm, I'm not sure whether vdb came with the original. I remember I
> > had to patch some stuff (specifically droping the 'vbd_' prefix). But
> > I do not remember and I have no spare cycles currently to dive into
> > this.
>
> The git HEAD of ncbi-vdb looks mostly good to go at this point, and
> AFAICT simply needs to account for the fact that sra-sdk needs both
> interfaces/vfs/services-priv.h and libs/vfs/services-priv.h, neither of
> which can substitute for the other. I'd suggest installing the latter
> as services-priv-internal.h and patching sra-sdk's
> tools/util/validate-names4.c accordingly.
>
> Meanwhile, it looks like sra-sdk's latest "2.10.4+dfsg" upstream tree
> wound up as an accidental copy of ncbi-vdb.
Just want to repeat that I currently have no spare cycles for this. Do
you want to express we should package ncbi-vdb Git HEAD rather than a
release tarball? I also need to say that I'm afraid I do not understand
your second paragraph. I'd be super happy if you would find some time
to turn your hints into code in salsa. ;-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
