Dear Sébastien,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:40:48AM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> All the packages related to X-ray chest and CT-scan radiology in clinical
> setups can be considered as relevant to COVID-19 [1]. DICOM viewers (2D +
> MPR) and DICOM servers that work out-of-the-box are probably useful.
>
> Among others, this includes the packages from the "orthanc" family
> (disclaimer: I'm the author of Orthanc).
I know and I thank your for this and I really appreciate your work to also
maintain the Debian packages!
> Regarding COVID-19, I'm currently working on enabling Python scripting in
> Orthanc to automate routing of medical images in hospitals, and on a new
> generation of 3D viewers (MPR) that can display CT-scans directly in the Web
> browsers through WebAssembly. (BTW, an updated version of the "emscripten"
> package would be needed to have an official Debian package of such a Web
> viewer.)
Did you files a bug report against emscripten? We might consider to use
some "COVID-19 relevant" text snippet in the title of the bug.
> As far as I'm concerned, as all my free time is dedicated to this work, it
> is not possible for me to help on Debian packaging besides the "orthanc*"
> packages I maintain.
OK.
> Other related packages in Debian Med [2] notably include aeskulap, conquest,
> dcmtk, ginkgocadx, imagej, gdcm, and slicer. Also, note that GNU Health now
> features an Orthanc integration [3].
I moved the orphaned slicer Git archive from Science team to Med team and
did some automatic upgrade[4] and droped some hints in d/changelog for
volunteers grabbing that package. It needs to be re-introduced and probably
repackaged from scratch. (These upstream hints[5] migh be helpful in doing
so.)
I've turned all your hints into "code" - means I updated the covid-19 task[6]
Your hints are really appreciated and we really urgently need exactly this
kind of hints from other fields, namely Bioinformatics. I do not want to
blindly move the while bio task into covid-19. So please help!
> This list is by no way exhaustive!
Other hints are really welcome.
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
> [1]
> https://www.acr.org/Advocacy-and-Economics/ACR-Position-Statements/Recommendations-for-Chest-Radiography-and-CT-for-Suspected-COVID19-Infection
> [2] https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/imaging
> [3] https://pypi.org/project/gnuhealth-orthanc/
[4] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/slicer
[5]
https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Nightly/Developers/Build_Instructions
[6]
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/med/-/commit/dc23f29287c999b38b1319ab84629d4cf31c64bd
>
> On 24/03/20 07:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm **REALLY** waiting for input which of our packages are
> > COVID-19 relevant. Where should we put our focus on?
> > Are bugs in macs more relevant than other packages and who
> > is willing to fix those bugs?
> >
> > Thanks a lot for any input
> >
> > Andreas.
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
