Thanks for this. I did my test build wrong; now my results match yours. Seems that vg will not be backportable unless we track down which of the dependencies require a newer version.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:03 AM Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:17:30PM +0100, Michael Crusoe wrote: > > gbp clone g...@salsa.debian.org:med-team/vg.git -b > debian/buster-backports > > > > A test build in a buster backports sbuild just succeeded. > > > > Should be already to upload and tag, thanks! > > ... > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/00_unittest.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > t/02_vg_construct.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 25 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 24 > t/05_vg_find.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 28 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 24 > t/07_vg_map.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 55 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 54 > t/13_vg_sim.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 14 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 11 > t/16_vg_msga.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 14 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 6, 11 > t/18_vg_call.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 7 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 3, 7 > t/27_vg_genotype.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 5 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 3 > t/31_vg_add.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 3) > Failed tests: 1-2, 5 > Files=48, Tests=605, 143 wallclock secs ( 0.18 usr 0.05 sys + 194.88 cusr > 27.50 csys = 222.61 CPU) > Result: FAIL > > > :-( > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > -- Michael R. Crusoe
