On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:45:54PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > Seems that was a classical mis-communication. I assumed *you* would > > have injected the new version in Debian packaging Git on Salsa (since > > I suggested to write the tests for the latest version). > > > Sorry, but I was not even thinking about you assuming me to inject the new > version.. What I thought is that you had checked the package's homepage and > there had not been any updates to the version 2.9.1, so you offered me to > add tests for the version 2.9.0. Since I usually just run all the package's > tools using some test data, I believed that even if this new version was on > its way, the tools would not change so much that I would need to rewrite > the tests completely.
No matter what injecting a new tarball is no magic at all. I'd recommend to try next time. ;-) > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 at 07:24 Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > I tried to recreate an original tarball from the repository, but > pristine-tar failed with the following error message: > > xdelta3: target window checksum mismatch: XD3_INVALID_INPUT > xdelta3: normally this indicates that the source file is incorrect > xdelta3: please verify the source file with sha1sum or equivalent > pristine-tar: Failed to reproduce original tarball. Please file a bug > report. Hmmm, I remember that there was some issue with trying to build on a stable (Ubuntu??) system what was injected with testing or unstable. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
