Hi Andreas, 2018-04-26 9:10 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>: > I noticed several commits of yours doing something like: > > - Entry: OMIC_04161 > + Entry: OMICS_04161
I did it when I tried to sort out which packages should be reported in the OMICtools newsletter. I think, all OMICtools IDs in our database are correct now. No new incorrect OMICtools ID should appear, they were used at the beginning when the OMICtools website incorrectly reported them. > > I wonder whether we should check our IDs (may be not only the OMIC > ones?) with some regexpes. For a first shot I could issue an error > in the UDD importer logs (but I'm not frequently observing these). > Yes, of course, we should check other IDs (I am thinking, at least, about the "RRID -> SciCrunch" currently manually corrected by Steffen) I don't know how to use the UDD importer logs but I will be happy to learn. > We could also consider lintian. > The lintian checks (including #731340) are somewhere on my todo list but I need to find time :-) > Another option would be to write some own Debian Med checker and add it > may be to our helper-scripts[1]. This checker should definitely call > yamllint (may be ignoring some issues we do not care about - for me to > long lines are a non-issue and also the missing "---" is perfectly > tolerated by all our tools). We could add some useful regexp checks and > everybody who commits metadata files that are failing this checker will > offer a beer to the one who wrote the checker at the next sprint. ;-) > I will think about this kind of checker but definitely you know how to motivate me :-) Best, Dylan
