UPDATE - The following patch makes pbuilder happy again:
>>>>>
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 3741d90..302af99 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Build-Depends: cmake,
libpng-dev,
libpugixml-dev,
libsqlite3-dev,
- libssl-dev,
+ libssl1.0-dev | libssl-dev,
libwrap0-dev,
unzip,
uuid-dev,
<<<<<
To be fair, I don't understand why this patch works (shouldn't "libssl-dev"
abstract versioning?), and whether this is the correct solution to the bug
report. Please could someone review the patch?
BTW, the same problem will likely also affect the "orthanc-wsi" package
that has been pending in the NEW queue for about 3 weeks:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/orthanc-wsi_0.1+dfsg-1.html
Sébastien-
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Sébastien Jodogne <s.jodo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a problem understanding what is going wrong in the attached bug
> report.
>
> If I open the "debian/control" file of the "orthanc" package, I indeed see
> that the package Build-Depends on "libssl-dev":
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/orthanc.git/tree/debian/control
>
> However, if I run the following session of commands, I see that
> "libssl-dev" is still available in unstable:
>
> >>>>>
> jodogne@debian-unstable:~$ sudo apt-get update
> Hit:1 http://ftp.belnet.be/debian unstable InRelease
> Reading package lists... Done
> jodogne@debian-unstable:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> jodogne@debian-unstable:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> jodogne@debian-unstable:~$ apt-cache search libssl-dev
> libssl-dev - Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - development files
> <<<<<
>
> As a consequence, I don't understand why the rebuild failed. Is it a
> transient issue? Please could someone kindly give me an explanation? Thanks
> in advance!
>
> Regards,
> Sébastien-
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org>
> Date: Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:26 AM
> Subject: Bug#844835: orthanc: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
> libssl-dev
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
>
>
> Source: orthanc
> Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > +-----------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------+
> > | Install package build dependencies
> |
> > +-----------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------+
> >
> >
> > Setup apt archive
> > -----------------
> >
> > Merged Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper (>= 9), doxygen,
> libboost-all-dev, libcharls-dev, libcurl4-openssl-dev | libcurl4-dev,
> libdcmtk-dev, libgtest-dev, libjpeg-dev, libjs-jquery, libjsoncpp-dev,
> liblua5.1-0-dev, libpng-dev, libpugixml-dev, libsqlite3-dev, libssl-dev,
> libwrap0-dev, unzip, uuid-dev, zlib1g-dev, yui-compressor
> > Filtered Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper (>= 9), doxygen,
> libboost-all-dev, libcharls-dev, libcurl4-openssl-dev, libdcmtk-dev,
> libgtest-dev, libjpeg-dev, libjs-jquery, libjsoncpp-dev, liblua5.1-0-dev,
> libpng-dev, libpugixml-dev, libsqlite3-dev, libssl-dev, libwrap0-dev,
> unzip, uuid-dev, zlib1g-dev, yui-compressor
> > dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-orthanc-dummy' in
> '/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-IyPUCn/apt_archive/sbuild-build-
> depends-orthanc-dummy.deb'.
> > dpkg-scanpackages: warning: Packages in archive but missing from
> override file:
> > dpkg-scanpackages: warning: sbuild-build-depends-orthanc-dummy
> > dpkg-scanpackages: info: Wrote 1 entries to output Packages file.
> > Ign:1 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-IyPUCn/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> > Get:2 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-IyPUCn/apt_archive ./ Release [957 B]
> > Ign:3 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-IyPUCn/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> > Get:4 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-IyPUCn/apt_archive ./ Sources [476 B]
> > Get:5 copy:/<<BUILDDIR>>/resolver-IyPUCn/apt_archive ./ Packages [557 B]
> > Fetched 1990 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> > Reading package lists...
> > W: No sandbox user '_apt' on the system, can not drop privileges
> > Reading package lists...
> >
> > Install orthanc build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Installing build dependencies
> > Reading package lists...
> > Building dependency tree...
> > Reading state information...
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-orthanc-dummy : Depends: libssl-dev but it is not
> going to be installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > apt-get failed.
>
> The full build log is available from:
> http://aws-logs.debian.net/2016/11/18/orthanc_1.1.0+dfsg-2_unstable.log
>
> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
>
> About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
>
