Hello,
على الجمعـة 18 آذار 2016 00:04، كتب Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:37:59PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>> This question came up before and we agreed that it should go to
>> science-tools.
>
> Ahhh, that's simply me to forget things. ;-)
>
Haha, I felt some déjà vu when I read your message.
>> However, it turns out that you had added it to that task
>> as "cwl" when the package name is actually "cwltool". That is probably
>> why you didn't see it on any task page. I just now fixed the name.
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
No problem
> However, even if we have discussed this before the situation is that if
> we recommend biologists to install med-bio and med-bio-dev they end up
> with an installation without cwltool. One way to fix this is to add
> science-tools to the Dependencies of med-bio. Alternatively I do not
> see any problem in mentioning cwltool in science-tools *and* med-bio -
> finally it does not harm to advertise good things in more than one
> place. What do you think?
>
This also came up before [1] :). We decided to go with making
science-tools itself a Suggests by med-bio and med-imaging. I mistakenly
wrote it as debian-science-tools, which you subsequently fixed in this
commit:
~~~
commit 3a292dd808096216a76f93d1faa8e0e49d7f5a84
Author: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
Date: Wed Feb 17 11:29:38 2016 +0100
The package is not (or rather will not be) named
debian-science-tools but rather science-tools (please remember me to
release a new version of Debian Science)
~~~
I guess now is a good time to remind you to release a new version of
Debian Science :)
Thanks and regards
Afif
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2016/02/msg00084.html
--
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name
