Hi Andreas,

No problem, Andreas. 

Thanks! I've just seen that InVesalius package was accepted at Unstable. 

Best regards!

----- Mensagem original -----
De: "Andreas Tille" <andr...@an3as.eu>
Para: "debian-med" <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 17 de julho de 2015 11:57:59
Assunto: Re: Updated the package to new invesalius version

Hi Thiago,

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:20:05AM -0300, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote:
> Sorry for ask ... but someone took a look at the changes I did?

Unfortunately not. :-(  From my point it got lost after beeing back from
vacation but I'll care for it right now.

> I'm asking because I saw a email about InVesalius being marked for 
> autoremoval from Debian Testing.

That's not because of invesalius itself but rather its predependencies:

invesalius 3.0~b5-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-08-04

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
777765: activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5
777868: gdcm: ftbfs with GCC-5
791508: gdcm: gccxml doesn't produce a gcc-5 compatible code.


These are hard ones and any help is welcome.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150717145759.gl13...@an3as.eu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/336412383.544001.1437155206396.javamail.zim...@cti.gov.br

Reply via email to