Once again, thanks for all your explanations! > It would likely work for making orthanc only weakly depend on > PG running. However, it would not guarantuee that PG is > running when orthanc is configured to use PG.
I am unsure to understand the second part of this paragraph: Does "Should-Start" only mean that when the Orthanc service starts, PostgreSQL is guaranteed to start during the boot process, but not necessarily *before* Orthanc? By contrast, does "Required-Start" means that the boot process will start Orthanc only when PostgreSQL is started? > Would Orthanc still fail when configured for PG but PG not > running or would it (silently ?!) fall back to use sqlite ? If Orthanc is configured for PG but PG is not started, Orthanc will stop and will *not* fallback to sqlite. Another point of attention is the following: Orthanc-PG does not necessarily requires PG to be running on the localhost (the PG server could be elsewhere). BTW, "debian/control" currently only "Suggests" postgresql. Would not this argument vote for "Should-Start" instead of "Required-Start"? To be fair, I am more and more confused between the pros&cons of the introduction of the "orthanc-sqlite" package... I really feel unable to take the best decision by myself. The "orthanc-postgresql" and "orthanc-sqlite" are now ready for release. I could easily revert to "orthanc-postgresql" alone. Andreas, Karsten, would it be possible for you to take this decision in my place? I will just make the job afterward... Thanks, Sébastien- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1017390838.12602654.1425624281346.javamail.r...@chu.ulg.ac.be
